Skip to content
USPeptideRxLearnApply for an account

Data

Compounding data: verified tables with their sources and dates

USPeptideRx EditorialLast reviewed:

Every table in this section is built from a primary source that was fetched on a stated date, transformed by code that is committed alongside it, and published with what it does not establish. A number without a retrieval date and a method is not a fact a prescriber can act on, and most of the reference data in this vertical is published without either.

These are reference tables rather than explainers. Each one answers a single enumerable question, carries the date its underlying source was read, and states plainly what the table cannot tell you — which on a regulatory dataset is usually the more important half.

What every table here has to carry

A retrieval date, because a licence portal or a federal registration list is accurate to the day it was read and to no day after it. A stated method, so the rows can be reproduced by someone who does not trust us. A source per row or per table, linked to the body that published it. And a list of what the data does not establish, published on the page rather than left for a reader to discover by being wrong.

Cells are never blank. Where a value could not be established, the cell says so and gives the reason, because “we could not confirm this” is a finding and an empty space is not.

What this section deliberately does not publish

No table here grades, ranks, scores or recommends a pharmacy or an outsourcing facility, and none reproduces a federal inspection record against a named business. Those constraints are built into the shape of the data rather than left to editorial judgement: the record type has no field for a rating, and the one dataset whose source table carries inspection columns publishes only the aggregate. The reasoning is on where registered outsourcing facilities are itself. What the tables do instead is point you at the body that can answer authoritatively — which for licensure is your own board, listed in the state boards of pharmacy directory.

Nor does anything here describe what a preparation does. These tables answer where a body is, what it licenses and when we checked — never whether a drug works. The regulatory pathway questions are handled in 503A vs 503B and, per substance, in the compounding status tracker.

What this page does not establish

  • Every table is a dated snapshot. Boards move URLs and FDA’s registration list changes continuously, so a row is evidence about its retrieval date and nothing later.
  • Coverage is stated per table and is never national by default. A jurisdiction absent from a table is unknown rather than permissive or prohibited.
  • Nothing in this section states or implies the compliance status of any pharmacy, outsourcing facility or supplier, including ours.

Sources

Primary sources, fetched directly from the issuing body. No secondary summaries.

  1. [1]FDA — Registered outsourcing facilities under section 503B
  2. [2]FDA — Human drug compounding: the laws and regulations
  3. [3]California State Board of Pharmacy — an example of a board’s own licence lookup